Education failing boys
16th October 2012

In the Herald Sun I argue that education is failing boys as schools are made to positively discriminate in favour of girls.

FOR years, teachers and schools have been told to positively discriminate in favour of girls. Feminists argue that the way schools work and the way they teach subjects give boys an unfair advantage and it's time to push girls to the front.

Wrong. The reality is that girls outperform boys. The way teachers are told to teach and the way subjects are organised best suit the way girls learn and leave boys at the bottom of the class.

The evidence? Take the figures from the recent OECD publication, Education at a Glance 2012. When it comes to reading, one of the basics in education that determines success or failure, girls are well ahead.

And the problem is not just in Australia. The OECD report states: ``Girls outperformed boys on the PISA 2009 reading assessment in every OECD country and by 39 points on average, the equivalent of one year of school.''
Not only are girls a year ahead when it comes to reading, they are also more ambitious when it comes to careers and they are more successful in getting into university.

In relation to tertiary entry, the report argues ``the gender gap exceeds 20 percentage points in Australia, Denmark, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Sweden''.

Australia's literacy and numeracy tests provide more evidence that girls are ahead. With English skills, the NAPLAN 2011 report concluded ``average scale scores are higher for female students than for male students for Australia as a whole and for every jurisdiction. The differences are substantial and consistent, averaging 21 scale points''.

Even when it comes to maths, an area where boys traditionally have done better than girls, the bad news is that boys' results have gone backwards. More girls than boys are achieving at or above the national minimum standard.
Boys are also more likely to have behavioural problems, as measured by suspensions from schools. One Australian report looking at years 7 and 9 shows that the rate for boys, at 10.9 per cent, is almost double that for girls, at 6 per cent.

The reasons boys are going backwards are many. Given the effect of the feminist movement over the past 30 to 40 years, it shouldn't surprise that much of the curriculum and how schools work have been feminised.

In primary schools, the fact that there are so few male teachers means boys lack role models. New-age teaching methods such as open classrooms and teachers acting as facilitators and not authority figures all benefit girls and not boys.

Unlike girls, who are more adaptable, boys need structure and discipline when it comes to how they best learn. Boys need to be told what to do, to have a clear idea of how to do it and to have clear boundaries enforced when it comes to discipline and classroom behaviour.

The way beginning reading is taught in early primary school provides the best example of discrimination against boys. The more traditional method of teaching reading involves phonics and phonemic awareness, where children are taught the relationship between letters, groups of letters and sounds.

The new-age, progressive approach is called whole language, where children are expected to learn how to read as naturally as learning how to talk. When it comes to print, they are told to ``look and guess'' and work out the meaning by accompanying pictures or images.

As argued by Byron Harrison, a reading expert from Tasmania who along with Jean Clyde published Reading Through Tears, the whole language approach is guaranteed to disadvantage boys and lead to frustration and failure. And the way schools wrap children in cotton wool and ban physical games also discriminates against boys. As most parents know, boys need to have the freedom to be physical, to let off steam and to challenge others.

The gender police are also wrong to ban boys from wearing superhero costumes to school and from reading action comics and novels because there is too much violence and male aggression.

As child psychologists understand, such an approach is counter-productive because boys need strong male role models to excite their imagination and teach them about resilience, being brave and overcoming adversity.
Prime Minister Gillard's list of disadvantaged groups includes indigenous, working-class, rural and remote and migrant children.

It's time to add boys.



Archived News

> Curriculum review endorsed
> School discipline
> National curriculum review announced
> It's ability not SES
> SES not the issue
> Return phonics to the classroom
> Alan Jones interview - school funding
> Gonski a threat to non-government schools
> Greens Party policy a danger
> Gillard's education plan empty rhetoric
> PM's Press Club Speech
> Gonski review cultural-left
> Gonski review cultural-left
> News
> UK primary curriculum back to basics
> Ban competition in sport
> Gonski a danger to non-government schools
> Gonski a danger to Catholic and independent schools
> Gonski a danger to Catholic and independent schools
> Gonski report penalises non-government schools
> Don't attack non-government school students
> Responses to OECD report miss the mark
> Choice and diversity in education benefits all
> Greens Party intent on destroying non-government schools
> Government schools elitist and discriminatory
> The left has lost the culture wars
> National testing for mums and dads
> Gillard's educrats attack non-government schools
> Fairfax Press biased against non-government schools
> ALP's multicultural policy contradictory and flawed
> Failed education revolution
> School funding review
> A real education revolution - what does it take?
> PISA test and Australia - what does it mean?
> MySchool website used to attack non-government schools
> Greens Party to cut funding to non-government schools
> Old school is best
> Coalition best for education
> Greens Party to destroy non-government schools
> Gillard's school autonomy proposal all spin
> Gillard My School tests flawed
> Gillard My School tests flawed
> Liberals introduce school vouchers
> Non-government schools deserve funding
> Muslim curriculum biased
> Gillard still a closet socialist
> NAPLAN tests flawed
> Draft national curriculum dumbed down and PC
> ALP education revolution fails
> Yesterday, the ABC..
> Australia's national curriculum debate
> Australia has high social mobility
> British schools shadow minister likes Dumbing Down
> US academic critical of high stakes tests
> University entry must be based on merit
> Quadrant has just released a..
> Hi, much of the Rudd/Gillard..
> Hi, the Spectator has a brilliant..
> ABC radio's Counterpoint has an..
> In case you missed it..
> Rudd's education revolution denies school autonomy
> Donnelly book launch
> Rudd's education revolution 3 out of 10
> US experts say no to value-add

Sign in and have your say


Latest Blog

1st January 1970

Read Full Post!


$20.00 plus $6 postage
(within Australia).

Latest News

Education failing boys
16th October 2012
In the Herald Sun I argue that education is failing boys as schools are made to positively discriminate in favour of girls.FOR years, teachers and schools have been told to positively discriminate i...

Read entire article...

Sign up to our Newsletter...