Bonus pay for teachers - a bad idea
25th April 2012
In the Age I argue that the Commonwealth Government's teacher bonus scheme is educationally unsound and counter-productive.
Bonus scheme degrades teachers' sense of team spirit
THE state Teaching Minister, Peter Hall, is right to question the value of the Commonwealth government's teacher bonus scheme - a scheme whereby a very small percentage of teachers, if successful, will be eligible for an additional payment of $10,000.
Paying individual teachers a bonus is divisive and will only lead to ill feeling and distrust among staff.
As someone who taught for many years in government and non-government schools, the reality is that teaching is a collaborative affair where teamwork is crucial.
When teaching year 12 and when students achieved commendable examination results I knew that as important as my role was, so was the effort and diligence of students' previous teachers, who had been so effective in laying the groundwork for success.
As a past faculty head, I also know teachers depend on one another in terms of mentoring, sharing resources and teaching strategies and that developing a collegiate relationship is critical if students are to be properly taught. One can only imagine the hostility and recriminations if particular teachers are rewarded for accomplishments that depend on the skill and work of others in the faculty and school.
It's also the case that the proposed standards on which eligibility for the bonus are to be based, the National Professional Standards for Teachers, are an exercise in bureaucratic red tape and educational mumbo-jumbo.
Many of the descriptors used to detail graduate, proficient, highly accomplished and lead teachers are vague and generalised and it is often impossible to recognise what constitutes the difference between the various levels of performance.
Having to abide by the descriptors will also force teachers to adopt teaching fads and fashions that often bear little relationship to what happens, or needs to happen, in the classroom and that are educationally counterproductive. The plethora of descriptors not only impose a checklist mentality (simply tick enough boxes and recognition follows) but the evaluation process also forces teachers to spend an inordinate amount of energy and time collecting and collating lesson plans, student work, evidence of professional development and whatever else might be relevant.
It goes without saying that teaching is already a difficult, stressful profession and that teachers are being drained of energy and enthusiasm by being forced to implement, monitor and evaluate directives from governments and bureaucracies that often have little relevance to the classroom.
Adding to the burden by forcing schools to adopt the Commonwealth government's teacher bonus scheme will only make the existing situation worse.
Ironically enough, it's also the case that the national teaching standards, endorsed by state and Commonwealth education ministers in December 2010, emphasise the importance of teachers working collaboratively - the very quality lost if some teachers are rewarded and not others.
Much of the so-called Rudd/Gillard education revolution, including imposing teaching standards and a bonus scheme, is copied from overseas experience. In England and the US, for some years now, governments have designed and implemented a uniform approach to standards and performance pay.
Instead of proving a success and worthy of emulation, the fact is there is increasing evidence that many of the innovations we are being forced to follow haven't worked. In England Michael Gove, the Education Secretary, has described the teaching standards regime introduced by the previous government as ineffective, time-wasting and rife with educational waffle and jargon.
In the US, researchers have found little, if any, evidence that performance pay schemes, including offering individual teachers a one-off bonus, lead to more effective pedagogy and improved learning outcomes for students.
As noted by numerous reports into the characteristics of successful education systems, more important than offering rewards and reducing teaching to what can be quantified and measured are factors such as teacher commitment and enthusiasm, teachers mentoring and supporting one another and creating a school environment based on trust and reciprocity.
The very qualities that are undermined by a teacher bonus scheme where only a select, privileged few are recognised and rewarded.
Responses to this Post
Max Nankervis says:
I can't help but strongly agree with Kevin Donnelly on his critique of the Teacher Bonus Scheme (Age, 25/4/12:13), especially his comments on the potential destruction of a key element in teaching - its collaborative nature.
However personally innovative a teacher may be, they will still require concurrent support from other teachers and support staff to execute their ideas. The same goes when dealing with student personal and behavioural issues. The new "competitive" atmosphere can hardly be conducive to that atmosphere.
It was certainly my experience as a secondary teacher (now some time ago), and in some contrast to my later, more extensive, role in the tertiary sector where there is something of an "isolationist" approach in order to demonstrate that "my approach/idea is not only different from, but superior to yours".
And as for teachers having to "pay" to be assessed - with a sort of lottery type outcome: bizarre! Is this how companies award bonuses to their staff these days? I doubt it.
Middle Park, VIC
Vivien Johnson says:
There is no way that these payments will be anything other than popularity contests within schools or systems.In the ACT,for instance,there is no final external assessment so schools have a huge scope to determine their own standards-and they do. Standards in say,year 10 science can vary ridiculously between one high school and another.
There is a lot of pressure to conform so that one teacher who might be trying to teach to a realistic standard- based on maybe, their own level of achievement 20 years ago,will be seen as unfair,pushing the poor students too hard, and will be branded as an inferior teacher, needing peer counselling.
In the senior colleges, years 11 and 12,it is very easy for students to play the system, "heavy" the teachers and claim unfair assessment advantages(eg. late handing in of assignments) with some sob story and fake notes from a "parent"(impossible to verify -many whose parents do not speak or write English always write their own absence notes anyway.)
If there were external exams such practices could not happen .Of course, teachers who give in to this pressure are"good" and those who refuse are "bad".
Also, it would be considered elitist, culturally outdated and unfair to the "progressive" curriculum if awards to teachers were to be based on exam results in HSC subjects. Also, in my opinion, the so-called "parity of esteem" between English,Math,Science and P.E.,cooking, TV studies etc. is an outworn, unproductive notion based on outdated fads. Many things need to be revised before it will be possible to say just who the "good" teachers really are.
> Tame the black dog
> Non-government school win the day
> National curriculum review
> Cultural-left rules education
> Fix rowdy classrooms
> Beware the black dog
> Meritocracy good - OK
> Overcoming depression
> Rudd government removing barnacles
> Purpose of education
> Judeo-Christian values ignored
> Myths, fables and legends
> No more victimhood
> Gillard wrong to copy Blair
> Media bias against non-government schools
> Direct Instruction best
> Cultural literacy rules
> UK curriculum back to basics
> Gonski Report released
> Non-government schools in danger
> Gonski a threst to school funding
> Gillard's education revolution a failure
> School choice good
> Why gays/lesbians should not marry
> Garrett endorses school choice
> Gonski research papers a danger to non-government schools
> School funding and politics of envy
> Wheeler Centre public/private school funding debate
> Julia Gillard fails as Prime Minister
> Mad as a cut snake as insulting as meow!
> Wheeler Centre school funding debate
> Gillard budget 'F' for education
> Non-government schools deserve funding
> Rude students destroy teaching
> PM Julia Gillard not a social conservative
> My School 2.0 will be used to cut funding to non-government schools
> Gillard cannot be trusted on school funding
> 'F' for teaching standards
> Australia - celebrate Western heritage and Christian tradition
> Rudd/Gillard education revolution - fail!
> Non-government schools promote equity
> Non-government schools promote equity and success
> Faith based schools have the right to discriminate
> National curriculum should not be compulsory
> Gillard Government drops education revolution
> Gillard cannot hide her socialist past
> Gillard's funding promise cannot be believed
> Myths and lies about school funding
> Give all schools autonomy and promote school choice
> ALP can't be trusted on school funding
> Islamic curriculum one sided and biased
> Julia Gillard's Geography new-age and PC
> Julia Gillard left-wing and as guilty as Rudd
> Julia Gillard - political opportunist
> History wars
> ALP's education revolution flawed and counter-productive
> New York example has failed
> national testing educationally unsound
> High social mobility in OZ
> I often have doubts about..
> History curriculum PC and dumbed down
> national curriculum English C+
> Gillard refuses to support non-government schools
> testing and ranking schools is flawed
> Similar to Australia, where many..
> School league tables bad
> Published in Education Review..
> Is there an educationa..
> In the following article posted..
> The problem of badly behaved students..
> Extract from book in Weekend Australian..
> School autonomy the way to go
> Julia Gillard, the Commonwealth..
> Why I left the lefties
> Why I am a conservative
> Why the Bishop is wrong on faith and rights
Sign in and have your say
25th April 2012
In the Age I argue that the Commonwealth Government's teacher bonus scheme is educationally unsound and counter-productive.Bonus scheme degrades teachers' sense of team spiritTHE state Teaching Mi...
Read Full Post!
$20.00 plus $6 postage
1st January 1970
Read entire article...
Sign up to our Newsletter...