ESI BLOG

School funding and politics of envy
12th August 2011

Below is a comment piece recently published on the ABC's The Drum website where I defend funding to non-government schools against attacks by critics like the Australian Education Union.

School funding and the politics of envy

Prime Minister Gillard, when education minister, argued that school funding was such an important and sensitive issue that there was no place for the old politics of class envy and sectarian divide.

It's a pity that the federal president of the Australian Education Union, Angelo Gavrielatos, refuses to follow Gillard's advice.  Since the funding review was announced in April 2010 the AEU has mounted a strident and vindictive campaign condemning non-government schools, supposedly, for being elitist, privileged, over resourced and guilty of residualising government schools.

Ignored is that there are many non-government schools serving low to middle socioeconomic communities, that school choice is the right of every parent and that the current funding model is based on need; a situation where wealthier schools receive significantly less funding than schools with more disadvantaged students.  It's also the case that even the most well resourced non-government schools, in terms of state and federal funding, only receive approximately 70 per cent of what government schools receive per student.

Also ignored is that there are many selective government schools that discriminate in terms of enrolments and many government schools only open to those parents that can afford million dollar plus real estate in the school's enrolment zone.  It is wrong to argue that state schools are open to all comers.

The most recent version of Gavrielatos' attack on non-government schools is in response to last week's decision by the body responsible for the My School website to postpone making publicly available schools' financial details related to trusts, assets and other financial information (school fees and levels of government support are currently posted for all schools).

The AEU president condemns the fact that the additional financial information will only be available in 2013, not 2012, and berates non-government schools for being profit driven and wanting to hide "what they have in the bank and what they have stashed away in foundations and trusts".

On being interviewed by the Sydney Morning Herald, Gavrielatos attacks non-government schools for "receiving more funding per student from the federal government than thousands of public schools (and) rather than providing an educational benefit, the money is just boosting their profits".

That Gavrielatos' opposition to non-government schools is driven more by class envy than rational debate is proven by the fact that he fails to mention that both federal and state governments fund schools.  Add both and it is clear, on average and based on Productivity Commission figures, that whereas state schools are funded at approximately $12,639 per student, non-government students receive $6,607.

Put another way, whereas non-government schools enrol approximately 34 per cent of Australian students, they only receive 21 per cent of government revenue.  As illustrated by the example of Victoria's independent schools, where parents and other private sources generate 66.6 per cent of income, the reality is that non-government schools and parents across Australia save taxpayers billions of dollars each year.

Critics also fail to mention that while non-government schools receive financial support from governments in terms of per student recurrent expenditure, unlike government schools where land, buildings and infrastructure are paid for by government, Catholic and independent schools, in the main, have to provide for themselves.

Newspaper headlines like 'Elite schools reap solid profits with the help of public funding', 'Private schools escape scrutiny' and 'Elite schools with huge profits shouldn't get generous funding', while calculated to evoke a strong emotional response, fail to acknowledge that non-government schools have every right to save and invest.

Rather than being condemned for being financially responsible and investing funds earmarked for much needed capital expenditure and related costs, non-government schools should be applauded for saving governments, and taxpayers, the expense of having to contribute.

Instead of acknowledging the right of all students, regardless of school attended, to be properly funded by government, it's clear that the push by critics like the Australian Education Union to make public the financial details of non-government schools is a strategy to deny them funding.

Characterising such schools, however misleadingly, as wealthy, privileged and over-resourced justifies governments reducing funding and placing an increased financial burdens on parents in the form of increased fees.

Such attacks, in the context of the current review of school funding chaired by the Sydney businessman David Gonski, are also calculated to influence public and political opinion against non-government schools.

The biased and ideologically driven nature of attacks by critics like the AEU is made more evident by the fact that such critics never condemn those government schools that also charge fees and make use of trusts and other investments.

Balwyn High, based on the 2009 information on the My School website, raised $1,871,064 from fees, charges and parents' contributions and $1,008,880 from other private sources while Melbourne High raised $2,204,010 from fees, charges and parents and $2,416,288 from other sources.

Clearly, if Angelo Gavrielatos and other non-government school critics were consistent they would be arguing that the full financial details of government schools should also be made public and that such schools should receive less state and federal funding to take account what is raised locally.

 

Responses to this Post

Reply

 

Archived Posts

> Tame the black dog
> Non-government school win the day
> National curriculum review
> Cultural-left rules education
> Fix rowdy classrooms
> Beware the black dog
> Meritocracy good - OK
> Overcoming depression
> Rudd government removing barnacles
> Purpose of education
> Judeo-Christian values ignored
> Myths, fables and legends
> No more victimhood
> Gillard wrong to copy Blair
> Media bias against non-government schools
> Direct Instruction best
> Cultural literacy rules
> UK curriculum back to basics
> Bonus pay for teachers - a bad idea
> Gonski Report released
> Non-government schools in danger
> Gonski a threst to school funding
>
>
> test
> Gillard's education revolution a failure
> School choice good
> Why gays/lesbians should not marry
> Garrett endorses school choice
> Gonski research papers a danger to non-government schools
> Wheeler Centre public/private school funding debate
> Julia Gillard fails as Prime Minister
> Mad as a cut snake as insulting as meow!
> Wheeler Centre school funding debate
> Gillard budget 'F' for education
> Non-government schools deserve funding
> Rude students destroy teaching
> PM Julia Gillard not a social conservative
> My School 2.0 will be used to cut funding to non-government schools
> Gillard cannot be trusted on school funding
> 'F' for teaching standards
> Australia - celebrate Western heritage and Christian tradition
> Rudd/Gillard education revolution - fail!
> Non-government schools promote equity
> Non-government schools promote equity and success
> Faith based schools have the right to discriminate
> National curriculum should not be compulsory
> Gillard Government drops education revolution
> Gillard cannot hide her socialist past
> Gillard's funding promise cannot be believed
> Myths and lies about school funding
> Give all schools autonomy and promote school choice
> ALP can't be trusted on school funding
> Islamic curriculum one sided and biased
> Julia Gillard's Geography new-age and PC
> Julia Gillard left-wing and as guilty as Rudd
> Julia Gillard - political opportunist
> History wars
> ALP's education revolution flawed and counter-productive
> New York example has failed
> national testing educationally unsound
> High social mobility in OZ
> I often have doubts about..
> History curriculum PC and dumbed down
> national curriculum English C+
> Gillard refuses to support non-government schools
> testing and ranking schools is flawed
> Similar to Australia, where many..
> School league tables bad
> Published in Education Review..
> Is there an educationa..
> In the following article posted..
> The problem of badly behaved students..
> Extract from book in Weekend Australian..
> School autonomy the way to go
> Julia Gillard, the Commonwealth..
> Why I left the lefties
> Why I am a conservative
> Why the Bishop is wrong on faith and rights

Sign in and have your say

Email:
Password:
Register

Latest Blog

12th August 2011

Below is a comment piece recently published on the ABC's The Drum website where I defend funding to non-government schools against attacks by critics like the Australian Education Union.School fundi...
Read Full Post!

Shop

$20.00 plus $6 postage
(within Australia).

Latest News


1st January 1970
...

Read entire article...

Sign up to our Newsletter...

donate